Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU) Manufacturing Plant Project Report 2024

The demand for sulphur coated urea (SCU) is significantly driven by the increasing global population and the subsequent need for enhanced food production. As of 2024, the global population has reached approximately 8.2 billion and is projected to grow to around 10.3 billion by the mid-2080s, according to the United Nations. This surge in population creates an urgent need for higher agricultural yields to meet food demands. In India, which has become the most populous country with about 1.428 billion residents, surpassing China's 1.419 billion, the pressure on food production is particularly acute.

In response, India aims to increase its food grain production from around 300 million tons in 2024 to meet the nutritional needs of its growing population. SCU plays a crucial role in this context by providing a slow-release nitrogen source that enhances nutrient retention in soils, thereby supporting sustainable farming practices. Moreover, countries like Nigeria and Pakistan are also experiencing rapid population growth, with projections indicating that Nigeria's population could reach approximately 477 million by 2100. This demographic trend necessitates innovative agricultural solutions such as SCU to ensure food security in these regions.

Other elements to consider while establishing a sulphur coated urea (SCU) plant include raw material sourcing, workforce planning, and packaging. The production of sulphur coated urea (SCU) relies on several key raw materials, including urea, sulfur, and sealant components. Urea serves as the primary nitrogen source in SCU and is typically used in granulated form, which allows for effective coating with sulfur. Sulfur is another essential material, as it forms the protective coating that encapsulates the urea granules. During production, sulfur is heated to around 150°C and then sprayed onto preheated urea granules. Additionally, sealant components such as urea-formaldehyde resin and other additives like ammonium chloride and citric acid are used. These raw materials enable SCU to provide a controlled release of nitrogen, improving nutrient management in agricultural practices.

Moreover, to help stakeholders determine the economics of a sulphur coated urea (SCU) plant, project funding, capital investments, and operating expenses are analyzed. Projections for income and expenditure, along with a detailed breakdown of fixed and variable costs, direct and indirect expenses, and profit and loss analysis, enable stakeholders to comprehend the financial health and sustainability of a business. These projections serve as a strategic tool for evaluating future profitability, assessing cash flow needs, and identifying potential financial risks.

However, challenges such as environmental regulations, fluctuations in raw material prices, and the limited availability of suitable urea types may threaten supply stability. To combat this, manufacturers of sulphur coated urea (SCU) can invest in advanced production technologies, diversify their raw material sources, and collaborate with agricultural stakeholders to enhance education and awareness about the benefits of SCU. By adopting polymer coatings for better nutrient release and efficiency, manufacturers can improve product performance while addressing environmental concerns. Additionally, forming partnerships with farmers and agricultural organizations can facilitate the proper application of SCU. This proactive approach not only stabilises supply but also promotes the sustainable use of fertilisers in agriculture.

About Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU)

Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU), also known as Urea Gold, is a slow-release fertiliser that enhances nitrogen use efficiency in crops. By coating urea granules with sulfur, SCU regulates nitrogen availability, promoting better plant growth. Typically containing 31%-38% nitrogen, it also supplies sulfur, essential for various metabolic processes in plants. SCU is particularly beneficial in rice and wheat cultivation, improving yields and reducing nitrogen leaching losses. SCU was developed at the Tennessee Valley Authority laboratories in the USA and has been commercially produced for nearly 30 years. In India, it has recently gained attention as a premium fertiliser alternative.

Properties of Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU)

Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU) contains 31% to 38% nitrogen and about 17% sulfur, making it a dual-purpose fertiliser that not only provides essential nitrogen but also supplies sulfur, which is crucial for various metabolic processes in plants. The physical properties of SCU include a yellowish goldish colour, attributed to the sulfur coating, which acts as a semi-permeable barrier that controls the release of nitrogen. This coating allows for a gradual release of nitrogen over a period of 30 to 120 days, depending on environmental conditions, thereby significantly reducing nitrogen losses through leaching, volatilisation, and denitrification. The slow release improves nitrogen use efficiency by up to 30% compared to conventional urea, leading to better crop yields and reduced environmental impact. Additionally, SCU helps maintain soil health by minimising nitrogen runoff and promoting sustainable agricultural practices.

Manufacturing Process of Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU)

The production of sulphur coated urea (SCU) begins with the preparation of urea prills, where liquid urea is sprayed into a prilling tower to form small, round particles. Next, elemental sulfur is melted and heated to approximately 135°C (275°F). The urea prills are then transferred into a rotating drum, also heated to the same temperature, where the molten sulfur is sprayed onto the prills. This allows the sulfur to solidify and adhere to the urea. After coating, the prills are cooled and screened to eliminate any oversized or undersized particles before being bagged or stored for distribution.

Read more about this report - REQUEST FREE SAMPLE COPY IN PDF

Applications and Drivers of Sulphur Coated Urea (SCU)

SCU market growth is primarily driven by its ability to provide a slow and steady release of nitrogen and sulfur, promoting improved plant growth and yield. The growing demand for fruits and vegetables globally, along with the need to improve their quality and shelf-life, has led to increased adoption of SCU in the production of these crops. SCU is also gaining popularity in turf and ornamental applications, such as golf courses, sports fields, and residential lawns, due to its ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and ability to maintain healthy turfgrass. The rising preference for premium fertilisers, driven by the growing trend of landscaping in urban and residential complexes, is expected to further complement the growth of the SCU market.

Key Features of the Sulphur Coated urea (SCU) Production Cost Report

A detailed overview of production cost analysis that evaluates the manufacturing process of sulphur coated urea (SCU) is crucial for stakeholders considering entry into this sector. Furthermore, stakeholders can make informed decisions based on the latest economic data, technological innovations, production process, requirements of raw materials, utility and operating costs, capital investments by major players, pricing strategies, and profit margins. For instance, the Indian government has recently initiated efforts to promote the production and sale of sulphur coated urea (SCU), branded as "Urea Gold," with a dual objective. Firstly, SCU aims to serve as a slow-release fertiliser that significantly enhances nitrogen uptake by crops, potentially increasing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by 10-15 percentage points.

Secondly, it addresses sulfur deficiencies in soils, particularly benefiting crops like oilseeds and pulses, which require more sulfur. SCU contains 37% nitrogen and 17% sulfur, providing a balanced nutrient profile compared to ordinary urea, which has 46% nitrogen.

Below are the sections that further detail the comprehensive scope of the prefeasibility report for a sulphur coated urea (SCU) production plant:

Market Dynamics and Trends: Growth factors such as the need for sustainable agricultural practices significantly affect market conditions in the sulphur coated urea (SCU) sector. The rising awareness regarding the negative impacts of conventional fertilisers, particularly their contribution to eutrophication and water pollution, has led to a greater demand for controlled-release fertilisers like SCU. Technological advancements in agriculture, such as precision farming techniques, are enhancing the effectiveness of SCU by improving nutrient application based on real-time data, thereby increasing its appeal among modern farmers. Understanding these trends helps businesses align their production plans with demands and trends in the sulphur coated urea (SCU) market.

Profiling of Key Industry Players: Leading manufacturers in the sulphur coated urea (SCU) market comprise a mix of global and Indian companies. Notable international players include Nutrien Ltd., J.R. Simplot Chemicals, Israel Chemicals Ltd., Syngenta AG, and Yara International ASA. In India, key contributors include Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers (RCF), Chambal Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited, Coromandel International Limited, and Gujarat State Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. As reported in December 2024, Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers (RCF) has achieved significant sales in the current year by selling 12,286 tons of sulphur coated urea, also known as Urea Gold.  The commercial production of sulphur coated urea began at RCF's Trombay plant during the 2023-24 fiscal year. Since then, RCF has dispatched a total of 13,844 tonnes, indicating strong market demand across India.

Economic Analysis: Capital expenditure (CAPEX) analysis provides stakeholders the knowledge about required investments in advanced technologies, efficient machinery, and necessary infrastructure. Investing in high-capacity mixing equipment, such as a continuous mixer or high-shear mixer, can improve production efficiency by 20-30%. Investing in energy-efficient systems, such as combined heat and power (CHP) systems could reduce energy consumption by up to 30%, as these systems use waste heat from production processes to generate electricity and provide heating.

Historical, Current, and Forecasted Price Trends

Fluctuations in sulphur coated urea (SCU) prices are significantly influenced by the costs of essential raw materials, particularly urea and sulphur. As of November 2024, the average price of urea is approximately USD 496 per ton, reflecting a decline of about 14% compared to the previous year. In June 2024, the Black Sea urea price reached USD 336 per ton, marking an 18% increase from May 2024, showcasing volatility in the market driven by supply and demand dynamics. Meanwhile, sulphur prices have also experienced fluctuations, contributing to overall production costs for SCU.  In 2024, the price of SCU is projected to be approximately 12.5% higher than neem-coated urea.

Moreover, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) in India has approved the introduction of sulphur coated urea, priced at INR 266.50 for a 40 kg bag. This new fertiliser, branded as "Urea Gold," aims to enhance soil health, optimise nutrient release, and improve crop yields. The pricing strategy aligns with that of the 45 kg bags of Neem Coated Urea. This will benefit manufacturers by increasing demand for this eco-friendly fertiliser.

Financial Investment Overview for Sulphur Coated urea (SCU) Manufacturing Facility

Establishing a sulphur coated urea (SCU) manufacturing facility requires a comprehensive financial investment that encompasses various elements critical to the project's success. The following sections detail these components:

• Labour: Personnel costs must be factored in, covering wages for skilled and unskilled workers involved in production and administration.
• Packaging: Expenses related to packaging materials and processes are crucial, as they ensure the product is safely transported and presented to customers.
• Utilities: Key utilities needed to produce sulphur coated urea (SCU), such as electricity, steam, and process water along with their cost assessments help investors to develop more accurate financial models and budget forecasts, ultimately enhancing profitability. In sulphur coated urea (SCU) market, energy costs are significant, typically representing around 10-15% of operating expenses. This includes electricity and water necessary for the manufacturing processes.
• Transportation: Costs analysis associated with the logistics of delivering raw materials to the facility and distributing finished products to markets enable investors to select suitable location for manufacturing facilities, improve supply chain strategies, and negotiate better terms with suppliers and distributors.
• Land Acquisition: The purchase or lease of land for the facility is a substantial upfront investment as it aids stakeholders identify areas with lower land acquisition costs and favourable zoning regulations, ultimately reducing initial capital expenditures.
• Construction: Building the manufacturing plant involves significant capital expenditure, including site preparation, construction materials, and labour.
• Machinery: Investment in specialized machinery for mixing, foaming, and curing processes is essential for efficient production.

Profit Margins and Pricing Strategies

Projected profit margins and effective product pricing strategies improve overall profitability. Manufacturers might target a profit margin of around 20-30%, achieved through strategic pricing based on raw material costs and prevailing market demand. Effective pricing strategies should consider fluctuations in raw material prices and competitive positioning within the market.

Regulatory Frameworks and Environmental Considerations

The establishment of a sulphur coated urea (SCU) manufacturing facility must comply with various regulatory frameworks that govern production standards.

Key regulations include the New Urea Policy (NUP-2015), which aims to maximise indigenous urea production while promoting energy efficiency and rationalising government subsidies. The Environmental Protection Act also plays a crucial role in regulating the environmental impact of fertiliser production. Additionally, the Fertiliser Control Order (FCO) mandates specific quality standards and labelling requirements for fertilisers, including SCU, to guarantee their safety and efficacy for agricultural use. Compliance with Manufacturing Standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is also essential, as these standards outline the technical specifications and quality assurance processes necessary for producing SCU. Furthermore, adherence to the Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness, and Response) Rules is vital for ensuring safety in handling hazardous materials used in fertiliser production. These regulations support the successful operation of SCU manufacturing facilities and enhance product safety and marketability.

Key Questions Addressed:

• What are the detailed unit operations for sulphur coated urea (SCU) production?
• Who are major technology licensors with their process evaluation?
• How are raw materials or catchem procured and what are their cost implications?
• What utilities are essential for production and what will they cost?
• What are the labour requirements and how does this affect operational costs?
• What packaging solutions are optimal for cost and efficiency?
• What logistical arrangements are necessary for efficient product distribution?
• What are the estimated land and construction costs for a new sulphur coated urea (SCU) plant?
• How can profitability be maximised in the sulphur coated urea (SCU) market?
• What pricing strategy should be adopted for sulphur coated urea (SCU) to remain competitive?

This prefeasibility report aims to equip potential investors and existing manufacturers with crucial insights to make informed decisions in the sulphur coated urea (SCU) industry.